Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Mosleh
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ali Mosleh[edit]
- Ali Mosleh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No source he played in professional level Matthew_hk tc 10:08, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Im not fammmilar with International Soccer but; [1] clearly shows him to be a member of SV Wilhelmshaven. Pending if this team is considered professional than Id towards notability and be inclined to keep under WP: Athlete, however I am uncertain of this league and its play so if the integrity of the league isnt really professional id say delete. Any thoughts out there by someone famillar with this league? Ottawa4ever (talk) 23:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The Regionalliga in which SV Wilhelmshaven play is a semi-professional league, and so he fail's WP:ATHLETE. There's no indication he would pass any other notability criteria neither. Bettia (talk) 11:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Bettia (talk) 11:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- CommentRegionalliga was the 3rd level which may notable. But Ali Mosleh played at Regionalliga AFTER it became the 4th level, which is sem-pro level. Matthew_hk tc 20:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per previous comments. SV Wilhelmshaven isn't fully pro, and there's no evidence he played in a fully pro league before joining them. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.