Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali M. Mir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:31, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ali M. Mir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet GNG and even lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. This is clearly a promotional article and apparently an auto-bio. Saqib (talk) 08:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article lacks references, and I agree, it does look like an auto-bio. Page structure is also off, but that is totally irrelevant to my vote. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JenniferCraigCarter (talk • contribs)
Delete I agree with everyone. Lacks independent reliable sources, doesn't meet basic GNG, and the only reference provided doesn't even support whatever the article claims.Butch.labajo (talk) 12:30, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot find many sources for notability, so i'll go with delete. M A A Z T A L K 17:59, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete even if the organization he was with was notable, his position would still not be enough, double since the organization itself is non-notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.