Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Baba Khan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Despite some questionable "keep" opinions, the support for deletion is just not there. Sandstein 12:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Baba Khan[edit]

Ali Baba Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a singer is not in itself grounds for notability, so the question is whether there are multiple reliable, independent sources that discuss the person in depth.. I ran quick Google search and found this and this. (both cited in the article)

Both news stories contains namedrops, and quotes from the subject, which longstanding practice holds cannot be used to support the notability of the subject. In no source presented can I find the subject discussed with the "significant coverage" WP:GNG requires. Saqib (talk) 20:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:12, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DBigXray. शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 14:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mashaal Radio links (1, 2, 3, and 4) are not opening for me. Rest of the sources are not even reliable enough to support claims within an article, let alone to establish WP:N. Jang is a RS but it does not discusses the subject in detail. Also there's no point in posting links to Google search results -> WP:GHITS. --Saqib (talk) 08:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You need to provide links to coverage. Saqib (talk) 06:57, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here are some sources :1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Na Maloom Fard (talk) 15:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not a single source is a RS. You above claimed that subject has received coverage in Dawn, The Express Tribune etc. Saqib (talk) 11:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I just mentioned these because as I told the subject besides having RS also having other sources which also make some sense. Here are RS: The Express Tribune, DAWN, The Frontier Post and Daily Jang Na Maloom Fard (talk) 12:51, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
These news stories contains namedrops, and quotes from the subject, which longstanding practice holds cannot be used to support the notability of the subject. Saqib (talk) 13:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please see my comments above pertaining to the coverage you provided. --Saqib (talk) 08:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep This sources given below shows its relaible.He tribute Rehman Baba by the name of titled Malang Abdur Rehman. He is a Sufi Singer of pashto music.this and this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.245.9.61 (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC) 43.245.9.61 (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page. [reply]
  • keep this the source provided is a genuine and reliable.Pashto Sufi singer Ali Baba Khan released his video titled ‘Malang Abdur Rahman’ to pay tribute to legendary 17th Sufi poet Rahman Baba.Ali Baba Khan is a genuine Artist singer of kpk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.245.11.24 (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC) 43.245.11.24 (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page. [reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Hopefully we can get some non-sock input so we can make an informed decision on this one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 16:38, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The Dawn source looks convincing. Can't say anything about the other sources as I haven't looked them into much detail yet. Mar4d (talk) 15:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.