Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Algorithmic program debugging

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:08, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Algorithmic program debugging[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this method has achieved any notability. Suggest converting to a redirect to Ehud Shapiro where it is already adequately covered. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:37, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:56, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a new page which should be nurtured rather than deleted per our editing policy. It seems quite easy to find substantial sources such as Automated and Algorithmic Debugging and Algorithmic Debugging. Perhaps we should get an algorithm written to process new pages which would ensure that simple steps like WP:BEFORE were followed. Andrew (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to have a lot more sources when searching for declarative debugging, another term for it. At least with Google Books it goes for page after page, looks like a well known topic. -- GreenC 17:03, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The original paper was written more than 30 years back and there are good amount of sources on this topic in google. Unatnas1986 (talk) 06:46, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.