Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Hitchcock Edition Clue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cluedo#Variants. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Hitchcock Edition Clue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have done some research into each of these board games and I highly doubt they pass GNG. Many have been unsourced for years, for example the Alfred Hitchcock one has remained practically the same since it was created in 2006. I didn't nominate Cluedo: Discover the Secrets as it has a notable reception section, or Cluedo DVD Game because I worked on it myself and deem it notable. Coin945 (talk) 06:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they all appear to be as non-notable as the game above. Hopefully sources can be found to save at least some of them:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 07:07, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 13:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.