Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexys Becerra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alexys Becerra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only notability asserted is through some minor roles with notable things, and notability is not inherited. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. The article lists appearances in a number of major films, but imdb and other sources make no mention of her. Jimmy Pitt talk 22:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete while willing to accept that she may have neen in the films listed in the article, that fact that IMDB does not include participation could only mean her roles were so exceedingly minor as to not even merit an "uncredited" at IMDB. All I could find there was her work as a prosthetics technician and one named role in the film Saving Ronald Regan (2006).[1] So she fails WP:ENT. We have one 1994 news article from San Diego Union which speaks of her applying a prosthetic to herself when attending a Sci-Fi convention in San Diego,[2] and a 2007 article in Printweek stating that she is the organiser of the London Harry Potter Meetup Group.[3] So she fails WP:GNG as well. And unless they win some major awards, make-up artists have a tough time showing themselves as notable. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per MQ Schmidt. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.