Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexey Tatarov
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Alexey Tatarov[edit]
- Alexey Tatarov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Caution: NSFW. I do not believe this person or his "works" to be notable. The sources provided are very minimal and not RS. Searching Google, there doesn't appear to be anything discussing the person at the level necessary for a Wikipedia article. It seems to me to essentially be 2 Girls 1 Cup minus the notability. Chris857 (talk) 21:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The mere making of shock videos does not confer notability, without more. HillbillyGoat (talk) 01:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The sources provided really are reliable. I suppose that the nominator should read WP:DISC. Also I added 2 sources - articles about Alexey in lurkmore.to and in wikireality.ru. Qnyx77 (talk) 06:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You must be trolling us) Lurkmore as a source? I wouldn't go that far even despite contributing there myself. Ukrained2012 (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closer: the above "keep" is by the article's creator. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete No claims or proofs of notability for either the jar-sitting deed of courage or the blogs and sites that posted about it. I'm almost sure that many Lurkmore and Bestgore readers stuff their body cavities with broken glass. Happy stuffing, Ukrained2012 (talk) 19:00, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Um, ew. But besides that (WP:NOTCENSORED, after all), it doesn't seem very notable. People make all sorts of videos showing themselves/other people doing lots of things. No need to have an article on al of them, as per WP:BLP1E. And in response to above, WP:NOTABILITY is not the same as WP:VERIFIABILITY. Ignatzmice•talk 05:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.