Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandre Louis d'Orléans, Duc de Valois

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:55, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandre Louis d'Orléans, Duc de Valois[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He died aged 2. Can be a redirect to his father or mother, but no reason to have a separate article for this notability-lacking person whose only claim to fame is his family. Fram (talk) 07:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Royalty and nobility, and France. Fram (talk) 07:10, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Athel cb (talk) 09:06, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete people who die under the age of 5 are almost never notable, and nothing suggests this is one of the very extremely rare exceptions to this rule. Wikipedia is not a biographical or royal geneaological dictionary. We do not have place holder articles to fill out family trees.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment While I agree with the points mentioned, I do have to point out that many other articles such as Carlo, Duke of Calabria or Archduchess Maria Carolina of Austria (born 1740) also have the same issues. Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. All those should go. Athel cb (talk) 16:39, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Instead of deleting this article, why not just make it a redirect? Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Er[1]... Fram (talk) 12:34, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I reverted that edit to allow for this discussion. As I said before, I am open to discussing the article's movement, but would not like for it to just be removed without warning. :) Unlimitedlead (talk) 13:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.