Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandre Andrea Stefano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Andrea Casiraghi. Black Kite (talk) 22:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandre Andrea Stefano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability is not inherited and wikipedia is not a repository for every information. The two years old boy is an heir of the Monegasque not yet a king (who may probably have a page here). Anyone can be an heir to a thrown and that has not make that person notable. When the baby becomes an adult and assumed his father's thrown, we may consider an article but certainly not now. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 18:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of deletion, we normally merge minor royals into their most notable parent's article. Bearian (talk) 00:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to article on one of his father, Andrea Casiraghi, who he inherits his royal blood from. It's likely he will be notable in the future, but we can't consider that. Boleyn (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Prince George of Cambridge is one young heir that has a wiki article of their own. To use Wikicology's logic, this article and probably a huge percentage of other royal heirs would need to be deleted. To be consistent Wikicology, please seek them out and nominate them for deletion. Keep them all or delete them all. Please do not cherry pick whic heirs should be kept and which shouldn't. Why would Prince George be any more notable than this heir, other than press coverage? Postcard Cathy (talk) 02:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your comments, Postcard Cathy. However, I may not really find it necessary to nominate bulk of similar articles for deletion but may probably initiate a discussion on one of the article's talk page. Why I nominated this particular one is that, there seemed to be no coverages outside his birth and I have no idea of why the editors above felt it should be merged, simply because of a press coverage of the birth event. I don't think such coverage should warrant an encyclopedic article and I only expected the father's article to be updated to that effect (I mean the newborn). But let's wait to see the outcome of this particular discussion. Thanks! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with his father's article. Until Albert's children were born, Alexandre was seen as a likely successor to the Monegasque throne. However, now that Albert has two children and Caroline is no longer first in line, Alexandre's importance has greatly diminished. He is a great-nephew to a reigning Prince, yes, but he has no title himself and no real notability. In the future, he might gain similar notability to his father, aunt and uncle, but for now, he's just an untitled baby with a royal grandmother. Morhange (talk) 22:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.