Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Hamilton (priest)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. bad-faith nomination Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 04:45, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alexander Hamilton (priest)[edit]
- Alexander Hamilton (priest) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does this guy have enough of significance? A third-rate nobody is all he is. Whazuppman (talk) 01:51, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article is well-referenced and nominator is being investigated as a suspected sockpuppet. Cullen328 (talk) 02:42, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Close debate disruptive nomination from banned user. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural Keep - Invalid reason for deletion. Carrite (talk) 03:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Bad-faith nomination by sock of banned user. Erpert Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it? 04:13, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.