Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Wilhelm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Wilhelm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. The contents of the article not supported by the single ref. It doesn't say he's an A&R exec; it doesn't say he's a member of the Grammy Committee (it says he was invited to be); it doesn't say he discovered these people (it says he wrote about them on his website). I dug up two interview-style articles [1] and [2], but they fail the independence test. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An IP editor produced this on the article talk page. As the ref says "This profile has been automatically generated based on publicly available information all around the web. If this is you, you can Take control of this profile." There is no independence there. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of obvious notability. Proper references and some indication that the subject is notable would be enough for a Keep - but I can find no evidence of that here. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 18:14, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:30, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the Billboard piece is a very good source. But I can find no other coverage to go with it. No objection to recreation as he seems to be on hiw way to a career as a music exec who might be getting more coverage in the future. -- Whpq (talk) 17:01, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.