Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Azevedo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Azevedo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and the spirit of NFOOTBALL, his professional play consisting of 49 minutes in the league and 20 minutes in the cup. At least 100 and I would believe closer to 150 deletion discussions have shown this to be the consensus. Geschichte (talk) 11:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per nom, no indication of notability. Does it meet A7? bop34 • talk • contribs 13:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and this does meet WP:A7. I was unable to find anything that would pass WP:GNG in searching for 'Alex Azevedo' and his full name, 'Jorge Alexandre Oliveira Azevedo'. The sources already referenced on the page fail WP:SIGCOV. Heartmusic678 (talk) 14:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't meet A7, as there is a claim to notability, as he has played in a fully professional league. Speedy deletion is for the very rare cases when there is absolutely no chance someone is notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:09, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG, and a couple of FPL appearances doesn't override that. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 08:47, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. A7 entirely inappropriate. Giant Snowman 08:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose in principle, passes GNG and has active career.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If he's passed GNG in your opinion, can you please provide the sources which led you to this conclusion? It would behoove the conversation if you have evidence the rest of us may have missed that could alter this conversation. GauchoDude (talk) 14:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While technically passes WP:NFOOTBALL, fails WP:GNG which supersedes. Consensus for this situation resulting in delete on AfD discussions for Olymbios Antoniades, Agapios Agapiou, et. al. GauchoDude (talk) 14:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.