Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alesia McKinnon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alesia McKinnon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. Other than her IMDb page I couldn't find enough coverage about her. In fact, the TV series mentioned in the article, Clairvoyance: The Ellis Files, is currently a red link, and even if it weren't, the role, as well as McKinnon's other roles, do not appear to pass WP:ENTERTAINER as they are mostly guest or supporting roles. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – article speedy deleted for non-notability/WP:A7 a day ago. Fails WP:ACTORBIO and is much WP:TOOSOON.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable actress. --Edcolins (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as she's obviously not notable and there are no signs of improvement. SwisterTwister talk 22:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This excessively promotional article makes no claim of notability and there appears to be none to make. Alansohn (talk) 01:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above; I think there's nothing left to say. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 02:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy~~ Delete ~~-A7~~ - ~~Tagged as such as this is obviously A7 material, As the saying goes - No sources = No article. –Davey2010^Talk 01:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)~~[reply]

CSD A7 does not seem to apply in view of her IMDb page.[1] --Edcolins (talk) 13:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah nope I was indeed wrong as A7 states " The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. If the claim's credibility is unclear,", so nope you're completely correct, In that case Delete as non notable actress. –Davey2010^Talk 14:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.