Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alena Afanaseva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 20:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alena Afanaseva[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page. No evidence of independent third-party coverage in WP:RSes, just in crypto media and promotional placements. Was previously sourced with a WP:REFBOMB of crypto sites, Forbes contributor blogs, passing mentions in media punditry, press releases and non-RSes; a PROD was removed and the original author simply replaced the REFBOMB. Needs substantial biographical coverage in RSes to have an article about a living person - and that doesn't seem to exist for Afanaseva. David Gerard (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Cryptocurrency, Finance, and Russia. David Gerard (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Argentina. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: PROMO crypto fluff. [1] Forbes contributor piece, then sourcing is all from BeInCrypto. Hopefully now that FTX has gone belly-up, these crypto articles will die off. Very few crypto people will ever be notable, from what I've seen over the last few years here in AfD... Oaktree b (talk) 21:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, basically a professional profile with no claim to notability, WP:NOTLINKEDIN. There's a minor claim to notability of a website in relation to the SBF trial, but that isn't about subject in any way. —siro χ o 21:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Exceedingly poor and non-existant references for this UPE article. Promo linkedin effort. scope_creep^Talk 12:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.