Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Developers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 00:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Developers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:ORG. A before search only links to websites where organizations upload their profile & services. They lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 17:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 17:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 17:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 17:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 17:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 17:56, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable company. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lack of significant coverage fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. --Jack Frost (talk) 05:04, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above Spiderone 09:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete i found this profile which shouldn't be counted as a "reliable source", as Economic Times is a business-related newspaper which keeps company's "profile record" on their website. Therefore, the non-notable article in question lacks independent coverage in reliable sources. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete oh. please. what are we even discussing? Light2021 (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable spamcruft per nom. ——Serial 09:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability requirements. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:57, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & salt. It should have gone WP:A7 & WP:G11 but, now that we're here, having WP:G4 available may be useful later. The persistent sockpuppetry & vandalism on this AFD shows that some salt is needed. Cabayi (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Draft:Alejandro Developers too. Cabayi (talk) 10:03, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would have qualified under A7 as it makes no claims of importance, but not under G11 as the content is not exclusively promotional. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for my tuppence worth. Straight up native advertising. scope_creep^Talk 14:18, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable company, fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Nika2020 (talk) 21:20, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have nothing to add. Glades12 (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in article space. Calcium chloride may be needed. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:13, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, axe the draft too. (t · c) buidhe 22:43, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.