Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleena lodhi haroon
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- Aleena lodhi haroon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
doesn't pass WP:GNG. cited sources are not reliable enough. Saqib (talk) 09:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The Lahore News is the only source that might be 3rd party coverage, but it still looks more to be a work by her than a work about her. Clearly a fashion video by the subject is not a source of notability. A fashion video created by others about the subject maybe, but not by the subject. Wikipedia is supposed to be based on secondary sources, not primary sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:34, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.