Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aled Thomas (politician)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aled Thomas (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As noted in WP:NPOL, Wikipedia doesn't normally consider county councillors notable enough for a separate article, unless they've received significant press coverage. Likewise, being a candidate for national office doesn't normally meet WP:NPOL, absent substantial coverage in secondary sources, and I can find only routine local press coverage. Wikishovel (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Wales. Wikishovel (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. DankJae 14:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Beyond confirmation of his candidacy, coverage is either in non-RS or is routine. I don't see notability for politicians as being met. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JennaHughes202 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Election flawed article. It doesn't meet NPOL; the sources are also if not all not reliable! I can even see expanded LinkedIn! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Userfy so that there is some base material for recreation if he is the successful candidate. Rcsprinter123 (report) 16:54, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- There is no room for draftifying this article. Appeared on local coverage which is not quite SIGCOV especially for NPOL. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 07:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, doesn't meet WP:NPOL Robertjamal12 ~🔔 14:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above discussion. Not even close. Bearian (talk) 15:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.