Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Trevelyan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to GoldenEye. Don't usually close on one !vote but both nom & SC prefer Merge so Merge it shall be. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 11:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alec Trevelyan[edit]

Alec Trevelyan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources cited to provide notability. Should be merged into the Goldeneye article. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  01:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  01:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  01:10, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:24, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge a one-off villain without much in the way of notability for a stand-alone article. – SchroCat (talk) 14:39, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.