Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldo de Pape

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:16, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aldo de Pape[edit]

Aldo de Pape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doubtful notability. Promotional article. Struggling to find enough independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:BIO. Created by a WP:SPA, who has only edited this and the article about the company he founded, TeachPitch. Edwardx (talk) 11:24, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:29, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:29, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:49, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- lack of sufficient sources to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Walled garden / promo article. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree - lack of sufficient references, promotional. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotions or a repository of CVs. -- HighKing++ 12:17, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.