Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldo (musician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 00:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aldo (musician)[edit]
- Aldo (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article cites no sources and those external links provided are either unrelated or are the homepage of the subject. As mentioned on the talk page, there is also some cause to suspect the page is an advert. What little notability is claimed within the article is not supported by any evidence or citation. Mr. G. Williams (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, seems to be a very good self-promoter, but not a great deal of independent coverage that I can see. Not even listed on AMG, which is usually a pretty big red flag. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:02, 30 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:MUSICBIO. Article asserts notability but fails to provide any verification of subject's importance. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.