Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Album 4 (Matt Cardle album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Album 4 (Matt Cardle album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnamed and unscheduled album, without any sourcing about a potential release date. WP:FUTURE. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:16, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. When more detailed information is released, article can be created under the appropriate album title. We're not in a hurry. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Welfare State ‖ 23:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - can be re-inserted if and when an album is released.--Rpclod (talk) 05:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom and Ebyabe. Doesn't even really seem debatable considering there's presently literally zero prose in the article. Sergecross73 msg me 00:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Bit pointless creating an article with just an infobox - Would make more sense to create it once it's released..... –Davey2010^Talk 00:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.