Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albino Blacksheep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Albino Blacksheep[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability under WP:GNG TheMesquito (talk) 09:00, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Any news on this? TheMesquito (talk) 21:51, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep! This website is LEGEND! Highway 231 (talk) 03:11, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - A personal preference is not a valid reason to keep or delete an article at AfD. Mz7 (talk) 02:33, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 21:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I strongly suspect the sources exist. The "French military victories" Google bomb got some early attention (snippet in PC Magazine). In fact, there are lots of blurb-ish mentions (including this Routledge-published book, here, and so on), but I suspect there's more out there for a website that was fairly influential in the contemporary web. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 05:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The site's importance has waned over the years but it's significant in the history of internet culture (and the spread thereof). A quick look around yields: Google Bombing from a Time Perspective, WSJ - Time Waster: A Dance Like None Other. Not enough on their own, but I'm confident the sources exist. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.