Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Windsor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Lord Nicholas Windsor. This is technically a merge, as practically the entire article already exists at Lord Nicholas Windsor#Family. BLACKKITE 19:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Albert Windsor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
AfD as per discussion. Not notable enough to have a separate article: a section within his father's article may be sufficient. Suggest replacing by redirect to Lord Nicholas Windsor. MightyWarrior (talk) 10:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete article or redirect to father's page per nominator. The article for Albert is simply a genealogical entry. His parents are more notable than he is and if he needs to be mentioned, it can be on his parents' article pages or at an article about the title of prince in the UK. Charles 12:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable first male line descendant of George V to be untitled. Should have siblings, I would vote to delete their articles, but I think that this fact makes Albert inherently notable. The article is a nice size with sources. Morhange 15:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Inherent notability does not derive from being interesting or unusual. --Dhartung | Talk 20:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Lord Nicholas Windsor. A brief note either there or in the main Windsor family article should do. K a r n a 15:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Lord Nicholas Windsor--Pmedema 18:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. --Dhartung | Talk 20:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect as suggested. RFerreira 08:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect as per above so that people looking for what information there is can find it. Capitalistroadster 09:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have no objection to merging the information from this article with that of his father. What I do object to is a decision to merge and then only a redirect is done. This happened with Victoria Ribeiro where the decision was to merge. Instead she is not even mentioned at all in the article to which she is now redirected Princess Ragnhild of Norway. Noel S McFerran 23:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Royalty in the Line of Succession to the British Throne is notable. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 12:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - It depends on your definition of "royalty". Albert Windsor is not styled HRH (nor any other courtesy title above Esq). -- MightyWarrior 13:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment it is notable if you're actually royalty, he is not, and you are individually notable, which he is also not. Charles 16:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He is 26th in line to the throne, this is notable —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpacklambert (talk • contribs) 22:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.