Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Woskanian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alan Woskanian[edit]
- Alan Woskanian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Long-term unsourced BLP of little or no notability. The WordsmithCommunicate 06:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 07:40, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sourcing available through a Google search to suggest any notability. No higher degrees or appointments to satisfy WP:NOTE. Would seem to be the only claim to be different from thousands of other social workers would be Iranian- born but see nothing to verify that either.Wolfstorm000 (talk) 14:57, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it stands. Very little if anything at all outside social networking and self-supplied info sites. Even less about the Key League - which was registered as a business name in 2008. That's about the only thing I could find on it. Peridon (talk) 15:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Created by subject or someone related to them, not uncommon in the UBLP backlog, never substantively edited by anyone else. He attended a Lakers game while he was in high school in 1992 :-) (news source appears to match up to him), but no claim to notability in article and no sourcing to support.--Milowent • talkblp-r 16:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.