Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Downs (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 00:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Downs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Edwardx (talk) 10:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No coverage. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 01:53, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly does not pass the notability guidelines for academics. The claim that a book by him is a "leading book" needs to be better supported than one reference to one magazine.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.