Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alamy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alamy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has never had any secondary sources and in my searches I have not been able to find any. GB fan 23:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, despite the past AfD. I can't find mything online. I am willing to change my mind if someone else can fix this article. Bearian (talk) 17:22, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's this section page of stories about Alamy in the British Journal of Photography, I'm not sure if counts as notability. They certainly discuss the company as though you'll already know they exist, and there are lots of other discussions online of how to upload to them etc. Unsure of how to vote. Douglasi (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in depth coverage in reliable sources as required by the WP:GNG. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.