Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alamby Leung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to DigitalRev_TV#Alamby_Leung_.282011-present.29. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:06, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alamby Leung[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not Notable per WP:GNG Brainclub (talk) 12:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge content to DigitalRev TV where DigitalRev_TV#Alamby_Leung_.282011-present.29 already exists. Not enough sourcing to pass WP:GNG for standalone article. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 00:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Delete DigitalRev TV already has an entry for this. Expand it as appropriate. Certainly doesn't need a separate article, which contains almost zero information. scope_creep talk 19:41, 06 October 2013 (UTC)
Keep This person is notable as a growing famous photographer. (User:H.Brian Griffin ^talk^|^contribs 16:10, 7 October 2013 (UTC))[reply]

You may be right. Are there any reliable sources to support the opinion that this person is notable, per WP:GNG and/or WP:ARTIST? The three sources in the article are not very reliable see WP:RS (2 blog posts and a press release). -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notable how? WP:GNG is quite clear. In this case we have two blog post mentions, and not even the major subject. One press release with her name as contact. No way this meets WP:GNG. -- [[User:Brainclub]Brainclub] (talk) 7:15, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.