Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Hamawat Al Fatenat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Al Hamawat Al Fatenat[edit]
- Al Hamawat Al Fatenat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed PROD, Prod removed. Prod rationale: Nothing seems to link the sole reference to the article topic, unless the title is a translation. There is insufficient material to constitute an article here, and the film appears not to be notable. No notability is asserted in the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the page creator is, probably by accident, removing the AfD template from the page, a page which now has content, something that was absent at PROD and at the time I nominated the article for discussion here, but whose notability I still doubt. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - A rough Google translation of the Arabic source does seem to relate the the plot summary outlined in the outline. This seems to be a notable Arabic film, though it might be difficult to find English sources. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 March 14. Snotbot t • c » 00:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 07:02, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.