Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlGhatam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 15:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AlGhatam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed prod. Family bio with absolutely no references. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article doesn't seemt show significant importance, and only holds a blogspot page for a reference. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I must point out that the article neither has "absolutely no references" nor "only holds a blogspot page for a reference". I don't know how it is invisible to the editors commenting above that it has a reference to Al-Arabiya. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:28, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are no references and the article would take a lot to improve. I don't think its worth improving because there are no reliable resources and there are many style errors, even in the first sentence.--Sarah.Maretich (talk) 14:44, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, why are you claiming that there are no references when there is very clearly a reference to Al-Arabiya? The subject may or may not be notable, but, at the very least, a decision on deletion should be based on an analysis of any sources presented. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.