Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Kamal Higher Secondary College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 14:05, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Kamal Higher Secondary College[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:V. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Kamal Boys High School (2nd nomination), which may be about the same subject. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:38, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm. well this is difficult. At present I've been trying to verify that it even exists, and the best I can find is [1] - which is a Punjab government document which has the address as "Gulshan Saeed Colony Mullan Wala Road Near Al-Kamal Boys High School Jampur". This is thin, but it does at least give a little hope that other sources may exist to show that the school exists. JMWt (talk) 09:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also a mention [2] and [3]. I've just read above that this might be the same as this other recent AfD - [4] so I've now no idea which is which. Or if they're the same thing. JMWt (talk) 09:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - on balance I think that relevant sources might exist, but it doesn't seem possible to verify that they're actually talking about the subject of this page. If someone is local to the school, one would think that they could find local sources to clarify the name and show it exists. But in the absence of those arguments, the evidence is too thin IMO. JMWt (talk) 09:25, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:23, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no independent WP:RS covers significantly to pass WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 13:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No WP:RS. The recent AFD was conclusive enough. D4iNa4 (talk) 08:37, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete merely existing is not enough to show something is notable. It is time that we start giving the same sorts of notability considerations to schools we give to other organizations.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:19, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.