Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Idrisi Montes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Idrisi Montes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Fails WP:NGEO.~~. WP:NASTRO Existence does not confer notability. I have no objections to a Geography of Pluto article but having an article for each recently discovered geographic feature is absurd unless they have some other notability. Savonneux cites. (talk) 00:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geographic features of astronomical objects is not covered in WP:GEO, my bad. My reasoning still stands per "subject of multiple, non-trivial published works."--Savonneux (talk) 05:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 00:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nowhere near as notable as Hillary or Norgay Montes. DN-boards1 (talk) 00:55, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete User DN-boards is in a campaign creating useless articles with complete disregard to Wikipedia's spirit and editors' feedback. If this was not enough, he is even asking to delete his own article. Can you smell a troll? BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:49, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:11, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.