Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akkel Ali Seikh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Akkel Ali Seikh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the cited references actually mention Akkel Ali Seikh, except one which seems to be a circular reference right back to this article here on Wikipedia. I'm struggling to find any of the contents of this article substantiated by reliable 3rd party sources, or indeed any online mention of this individual. _└^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 13:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless better sources are found. One ref is self-published 2-page article, another is a copy of Wikipedia article and cites Wikipedia as a source; the rest do not mention the person. utcursch | talk 01:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Although there's a valid potential claim of notability here, none of Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines can ever be passed just by asserting a claim of notability if the quality of reliable sourcing available to support the claim isn't there. Sometimes it's just WP:TOOSOON. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if better sources ever start panning out. Bearcat (talk) 23:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.