Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akira Suzuki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is that this is a valid use of a disambiguation page. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 07:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Akira Suzuki

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither of the articles this page is supposed to disambiguate exists. allen四names 03:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't actually find a policy that supports this deletion reason but common sense says there's no reason to have a disambiguation page if it doesn't provide any meaningful disambiguation service. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. How is the disambiguation service offered by this page not meaningful? I would have thought that common sense leads to the opposite conclusion, as this page leads to articles with information about two people with this name. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both entries are valid, per MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 06:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I just used this dab page to disambiguate; having redlinks isn't a problem as long as other pages link to the redlinks. Josh Parris 09:28, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- disambiguation entries need to have blue links, but those blue links are allowed to be in the description. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-oversight on my part, one of those days when I meant to start an article then got on something else and forgot. Stubs have been created for both now.--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The two articles may not survive a notability challenge but they now exist. I withdraw my nomination. Thank you. – allen四names 14:25, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.