Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhil Akkineni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:51, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Akhil Akkineni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too soon-just one role and a cameo (despite the fact that its a bit part not a cameo since a cameo is when you are famous already) So then nope not notable. Wgolf (talk) 06:21, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 07:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 07:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • -Wow thanks. And when her only roles are as a baby and later in a bit part (not a cameo as you have to be famous to have a cameo!) that is not notable and being part of a family does not mean you are notable either. Unless if she somehow the great granddaughter of the Queen or is George Washingtons long lost sist...(okay making that part up-but you get the point-otherwise we have every Barrymore family member on here and every family member related to Will Smith!) Wgolf (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.