Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash op aurora

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:56, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Akash op aurora[edit]

Akash op aurora (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nath1991 (talk) 13:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, clear spam and boosterism, as can be seen by the categories added to the page and the addition of this page to the "1972" entry. Also, most of the sources only discuss him in passing. Graham87 15:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Holy SEO Batman! Of the links on the page, most of them are spam/referral/promotional. Not seeing how this passes WP:GNG. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:11, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - If there was ever a reason for funnelling all new article creations through the article creation wizard via editor review, this must be a prime example. Wading through so many references to look for the nugget of notability was a considerable waste of time ; Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   16:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.