Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aji's

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aji's (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company, no in depth coverage and appears to be WP:TOOSOON Praxidicae (talk) 20:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Reliable sources are scanty, the first reference from Nepali Times may have seemed reliable but it seems it was placed as an Ad + promotional content on the site, while the rest are self published references. WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:RS. Lapablo (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The Nepali Times article is not promotional content. Nepali Times does not do paid article placements. There are two more references cited that are not self published, one by The Kathmandu Post and another by Republica which are both reputed national daily newspapers in Nepal. All three articles cited feature in-depth coverage of Aji's, two of them include videos which have received over 90K views. Chairdaily sf (talk) 10:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Chairdaily sf Irrespective of if it was paid or not, it is still WP:TOOSOON to have a page at this time. As it doesn't meet criteria WP:SIGCOV.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of 06:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.