Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Kapur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Kapur[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet notability guidelines for academics. Unable to establish notability through research --- appears subject is less notable than many other academics who do not have Wikipedia pages. Backfiah (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Backfiah (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hardly remarkable. Fails WP:NBIO. Ajf773 (talk) 23:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG nor WP:NBIO.-Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The sources we have that are independent of the subject are not in-depth enough for WP:GNG. I found more independent but insufficiently in-depth sourcing [1] but not evidence of actual notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.