Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aja (actress)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aja (actress)[edit]

Aja (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited and the sources discuss films not her as an individual. This is thin gruel for a BLP. Spartaz Humbug! 17:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 17:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 17:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 17:39, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not notable. Fails GNG. Porn industry awards do not confer notability per the depreciated WP:PORNBIO. Wm335td (talk) 18:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails the GNG. Industry awards are a PR push front.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:13, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 10:33, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Winning porn awards (WP:PORNBIO) was the only rationale for keeping this article at the previous AfD discussion despite the lack of good sources. Won-porn-awards-but-the-sources-are-crap porn biographies like this one were deleted even before PORNBIO was taken down. An independent search for sources yielded a brief book mention. No real claim for meeting WP:BASIC and WP:ENT notability needs more reliable support than Adult Video News. • Gene93k (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete on account of subject failing WP:GNG. Trying the inheritance angle does not fly. And porn awards, after the deprecation of WP:PORNBIO, no longer gift notability to a person. -The Gnome (talk) 13:26, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I was unable to find any reliable secondary sources on which I can build an article that meets notability guidelines. Missvain (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.