Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aishwarya Al Alsaud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 17:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aishwarya Al Alsaud[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable "socialite". Google search results in no relevant hits. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 03:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is just a simple fact of a woman who lived an life that most woman dreamed about but she maintains her privacy at cost. Just because its someone you can't google up or famous does not constitute that they're not important to society. There are many unheard of prominent people thats not written about nor discussed upon. As the wording goes 'socialite' have been revised to jet set, which madame is. I have corrected the wording and followed the guidelines as concerns go. Please, consider of not deleting this article as this woman have much to offer and need to be known about. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliver McNamara (talk • contribs)

Delete. No sources provided or found to meet general notability guidelines. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: With this edit by Oliver McNamara and and this edit by an anonymous IP, I'm beginning to suspect the whole thing is a hoax. The story is starting to change about her. Now she is supposedly related to a notable individual and instead of being the ex-wife of somebody, she is now still married to that somebody. And the sockpuppets have started to arrive on the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There needs to be some reliable sources in order for Wikipedia editors to be able to write an article about her with verifiable information. Right now, the article is completely unsourced, so I don't know how we could prove that this biography is accurate. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - for want of verifiable sources. If this subject is real she's escaped the radar totally. The fact that the Google results show very little outside Facebook and Twitter doesn't inspire confidence. The man named as her multi-millionaire husband is even more invisible... HeartofaDog (talk) 14:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with GogoDodo, according to those edits the story about her is changing too much. Not to mention the fact it is beyond notable for Wikipedia: no sources, no actual information aside from her alleged marriage to a man. SwisterTwister (talk) 07:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.