Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aisha Steel Mills

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aisha Steel Mills

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:NCORP. Greenbörg (talk) 12:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 16:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 16:05, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable subsidiary of a megacorporate group/s, and covered amply in refs: [1]. Mar4d (talk) 12:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at WP:INHERITORG which says 'No inherited notability'. Subject fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Greenbörg (talk) 15:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's WP:LISTED and has made headlines over the years. 1, 2, 3 & 4 -

Mfarazbaig (talk) 09:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:27, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails corp guidelines122.172.215.246 (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Although listed, the references provided above fail the criteria for establishing notability as they are all based on company announcements and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Searching through Google hasn't yielded anything better than the references provided. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.