Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air on Broadbeach

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America1000 06:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Air on Broadbeach[edit]

Air on Broadbeach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable building per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 02:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 04:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - It does have in-depth coverage from sources like the Gold Coast Bulletin and Architecture Australia. [1][2].Oakshade (talk) 06:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I wouldn't call a few sentences in one article and a short paragraph in another in-depth coverage. SL93 (talk) 15:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Actually on closer examination I think you're correct. I strike my !vote. I'm willing to change my mind if there is substantial coverage to be found. Oakshade (talk) 06:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:37, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.