Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air UK Leisure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 04:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Air UK Leisure[edit]

Seemingly non-notable airline Oo7565 (talk) 18:47, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Query - what's the protocol for airlines? Are they notable by default? Or must they be "covered" by media sources as with other things (people, companies, etc.). For instance, we do have a list of airlines, not all of which would be "notable" I presume. J L G 4 1 0 4 20:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seemingly notable airline. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources here and here. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs references but clearly notable. Rcawsey (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Airlines are generally notable and usually have significant coverage to meet WP:CORP as the links posted by Phil Bridger suggest. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 03:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.