Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Trecks
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge to List of Air Gear terms. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Air Trecks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Completely unnotable fictional variant of inline skates from the series Air Gear. Fails WP:N, WP:FICT, WP:PLOT and WP:WAF. Tagged for notability issues since February 2008 with no action taken to address these problems. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 00:30, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of Air Gear terms...an article which has its own issues, mind you. But there's basically nothing the Air Trecks article offers that isn't already covered in the list, or that couldn't be covered there equally well. Doceirias (talk) 02:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Concur with merge to List of Air Gear terms, for Doceirias's reasoning. I'm not finding much to demonstrate independent notability, so like all fictive things, merge into larger groups. —Quasirandom (talk) 04:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The merge and redirect would be nifty, but we're talking about item descriptions from a fiction that is far, far, far from cultural currency. This is not Lord of the Rings or Star Trek, and loading up our merge queue to preserve an edit history for something that is unlikely to be sought is kind of overkill. Utgard Loki (talk) 17:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If I said I'd undertake to do the merge myself when the discussion closes, would that change your !vote to merge? —Quasirandom (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.