Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Go Airlines (Egypt)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 16:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Air Go Airlines (Egypt)[edit]

Air Go Airlines (Egypt) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on an airline that operated one airplane for 11 months before going under is sourced to a planespotter website. A standard BEFORE finds only one additional source [1]. Article lacks sufficient WP:RS to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV. Chetsford (talk) 07:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Totally not notable. The one article could be considered trivial and isn't enough anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Insubstantial article lacking sources to fill it out. Dorama285 (talk) 15:02, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The Planespotter site appears to be crowd-sourced, so lacks reliability. Only other source I found was clearly a press release. Does not meet basic threshhold for notability. Glendoremus (talk) 21:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.