Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Force Three
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Air Force Three (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Per merge discussion, consensus was that the information did not warrant its own article but should be instead merged with Nancy Pelosi's article.
Additionally, Air Force Three does not appear to be a legitimate Air Force designation. While work has been done to improve the article, it simply does not need to be a seperate article. Mikemill 04:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this subject can be well-enough covered in the article on Nancy Pelosi. I don't see a need for a redirect or merge in this case since there's not that much to copy here. FrozenPurpleCube 05:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an obvious WP:COATRACK. Even the White House defended Pelosi on this one and the flap-flappers crept back under their rocks. Framing it this way has clear undue weight implications. --Dhartung | Talk 06:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Dhartung. The article has a clear POV. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Page completely pov and not necessary. Turtlescrubber 15:21, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, with little relevant to merge into Pelosi's article. Realkyhick 18:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Never heard of an 'Air Force Three'. GoodDay 19:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nancy Pelosi's article may make mention of it. WP:COATRACK seems to be a not-so-apt description of the article, as it diverges and goes pretty much all over the place. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Nancy Pelosi's article.--Gloriamarie 16:17, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as a coatrack, per above. Bearian 19:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Adam Putnam. 132.205.44.5 21:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Air Force Three" is a neologism (or more properly, a rhetorical flourish) by the SF Chron columnist cited as a source. Acroterion (talk) 02:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete See also that the discussion regarding a merge with Nancy Pelosi turned into a unamimous forum in favor of deletion. Talk:Air Force Three#merge discussion --Cjs56 02:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.