Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Europa Flight 196
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Air Europa Flight 196[edit]
- Air Europa Flight 196 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable air crash. Available evidence indicates pilot landed long. Covered sufficiently in Air Europa and Lanzarote Airport articles. Fails WP:AIRCRASH Mjroots (talk) 07:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There was no loss of life, no change to flight policies as a result. It's like making article about every non-fatal car crash - completely useless. - Mgm|(talk) 11:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, just a bad day at the office accident. MilborneOne (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Looking at the images and blog reports the aircraft did not leave the paved area and their appears to be no damage to the aircraft. Nobody was hurt and the passengers left the aircraft using the normal doors and steps. So really just an incident and not an accident. MilborneOne (talk) 14:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Another editor recently called my attention to proposed guidelines about for notability of an air accident (), and even within those non-binding proposals, I don't see that this would be notable.
Mandsford (talk) 22:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- we do not usually have articles even on fatal car crashes. This item was so NN that it did not even make the BBC news (or not one that I heard). Clearly NN. Can we not have administrative action taken against users who keep creating these articles on every minor aviation incident? Peterkingiron (talk) 21:24, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- It is accurate to say it was NN.Theseeker4 (talk) 15:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep who cares if there's no loss of life or injuries, its an incident that may end out to be pilot error or unclear weather conditions its still to early to delete an article which states that this "under investigation" for this incident. Whenaxis (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.