Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirMedia Group, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AirMedia Group, Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I considered endorsing the PROD but I removed it thinking AfD would be better as a News search found several results but now looking them, I'm not sure if the company is notable. There are some good sources along with some PR and searches at Highbeam found some links but nothing looks significant and notable and thefreelibrary found mostly press releases along with browser finding some results and Books finding one not helpful result. I'm not a Chinese speaker so I'm no use there but I'm not sure if there are more non-English sources. With an article like this staying from November 2008 with no improvement, it's particularly concerning. SwisterTwister talk 03:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No references present to support keeping this in light of WP:GNG or Wikipedia:Notability (companies). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:19, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as I was the one who put the original PROD in place (for non-notability and poor references). Primefac (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.