Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air-taxi europe
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of airlines of Germany. J04n(talk page) 22:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Air-taxi europe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:CORP: This corporate air charter company has not been the subject of any significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Also, the creator (User:Goosebump17) did not edit any other Wikipedia artcles, so it's likely a WP:COI case). --FoxyOrange (talk) 09:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 06:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:43, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment how is this different from NetJets? Both are private airlines. Chutznik (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- NetJets passes the WP:GNG. This doesn't. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Airline is current, I'd like to keep it. User:Pilot-NL (talk) 06 March 2013 (UTC)
- WP:ILIKEIT. How does being 'current' establish notability?
- Do not delete as the information is verifiable and important, but instead Merge and redirect to List_of_airlines_of_Germany. The information at that list can be expanded. This airline requires third party coverage before a stand alone article can be justified. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:V is satisfied, how is WP:N? - The Bushranger One ping only 09:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:N is not met, but WP:N is a standalone article criterion and doesn't limit inclusion on another page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:V is satisfied, how is WP:N? - The Bushranger One ping only 09:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-scheduled air taxi service that doesn't meet the notability standard. Nothing to merge anywhere; should not be redirected as this is not an airline, but an air taxi/charter flight operator - there is no scheduling. - The Bushranger One ping only 09:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.