Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ainslie Meares

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Randykitty (talk) 09:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ainslie Meares[edit]

Ainslie Meares (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a sufficiently notable person for a bio. Some incidental notability comes via Ian Gawler and the cancer-related controversies there, but none of substance to Meares that I can find - hence the current article contains unsourced, off-topic & coatracked content. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 05:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I withdraw the deletion nomination. Actually, searching further, it seems there *are* some reasonable sourced for Meares[1] - it just means our current article needs to be re-written! Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 06:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Was just about to mention that very source. There are some formatting errors but I see a myriad of books, publications and other works that have been cited on a number of occasions, according to Google Scholar. I suppose it's okay that I close this. --ceradon (talkcontribs) 06:02, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • As a matter of a fact, I can't close this under WP:SK. I suppose an uninvolved administrator should close it or it should be left open for further comment. Best, --ceradon (talkcontribs) 06:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose: Ainslee Meares was a highly prominent Australian psychiatrist and author over a long period of time. There is absolutely no merit in considering this article for deletion. Afterwriting (talk) 09:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.