Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee-Lynn Chadwick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:14, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aimee-Lynn Chadwick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly a bit-part actor that falls well short of meeting WP:GNG criteria. Cited only to a listing in the 'Contemporary Theatre, Film and Television' book. I can't see any evidence online to think she'd meet notability requirements. Sionk (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete bit-part actor. For example, in the film Prom she was in, the Wikipedia article has a list of 10 starring actors. She does not appear on that list.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:12, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §FreeRangeFrog^croak 06:31, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as passes WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 10:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Really? A search of this person's film credits shows nothing but credits for minor roles. A search of this person's name turns up nothing but facebook pages and other social media mentions. I'm sorry, but did you actually do any research into this before casting that "vote" ? Tarc (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This person appears to have zero coverage in reliable sources; a search turns up social media pagaes, personal websites, last.fm, etc... Her film credits are singular appearances in tv shows, or far, far down the list in a motion picture billing. Many of the roles are not even credited with a character name, i.e. "Girlfriend #2", "Bar Girl", "Student", and so on. Subject doe snot pass any notability guidelines of this project. Tarc (talk) 16:36, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. She has some major roles, but in pretty minor films, e.g. All American Orgy, and that, along with the lack of media attention, warrants a thumbs down from me. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete She Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NOTABILITY. She may become notable, but it is still WP:TOOSOON. --Jersey92 (talk) 23:48, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.